The proper fiducial argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Proper Fiducial Argument
The paper describes the proper interpretation of the fiducial argument, as given by Fisher in (only) his first papers on the subject. It argues that far from being a quaint, little, isolated idea, this was the first attempt to build a bridge between aleatory probabilities (the only ones used by Neyman) and epistemic probabilities (the only ones used by Bayesians), by implicitly introducing, as ...
متن کاملR. A. Fisher's Fiducial Argument and Bayes' Theorem
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your perso...
متن کاملWhat is the best fiducial ?
addresses the question: what is the best fiducial? A set of criteria that are desirable in an optically tracked fiducial are presented and a new fiducial image set is designed that meets these criteria. The images in this set utilize a square black-border pattern with a 15% border width and an interior image that supports orientation determination and unique identification. The interior image i...
متن کاملFiducial prediction
A real-valued fiducial process is a process in the probabilistic sense, but the probability distributions are not defined on Borel sets. The adjective ‘fiducial’ indicates that a group acts on the observation spaces and the probability distributions are defined on the smaller σ-algebra of group-invariant Borel sets. Since a different group action determines a different σ-algebra, the group is a...
متن کاملThe Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument
The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living in a computer simulation, Philosophical Quarterly, 53:243–255; Aranyosi 2004, The Doomsday Simulation Argument. Or why isn’t the end nigh, and you’re not living in a simulation, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/190/; Richmond 2008, Doomsday, Bi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics
سال: 2005
ISSN: 1571-0653
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2005.07.049